This review is from: Sony Xperia U Sim Free Smartphone – Black (Electronics)
I’ll get it over with first: the well-discussed (if you’ve followed the forums and read other reviews) lack of a memory card slot is a bit naff, but with a small screen you’re not likely to loading it up with oodles of videos. Bear in mind there is 6GB user memory altogether (2GB for apps, 4GB for media), not 4GB as many say. Know your needs, and take your pick. Rather annoyingly, the phone’s memory does not appear as a standard mass-storage device when you plug it in with USB, instead it uses MTP for which support without installing bloated extra software is somewhat patchy. However I have successfully coaxed it to work with Windows XP and Ubuntu Linux.
The design is surprisingly decent, build quality average to good, and the screen is luscious – do fit a screen protector (at least one should be supplied) immediately to keep it that way. Some may not be so keen on the widescreen 16:9 ratio compared with the iPhone’s 3:2, which does mean that although both are nominally 3.5″ screens, the iPhone’s is more spacious for portrait mode messaging. Android 2.3.7 works well enough so far, and Sony admit the specs (especially 512MB RAM) are a bit borderline for the promised ICS upgrade, so not sure whether I will bother with that. Battery life isn’t too shabby, thanks to the efficient NovaThor processor – with light use, 2 to 3 days between charge seems about order of the day, but obviously not everyone’s definition of “light” is the same. The camera is fair, with the 4mm f/2.6 lens well recessed to keep it protected, and a physical shutter button (also activates the camera from sleep) though it is quite stiff.
The supplied handsfree headset is about as cheap as Sony could muster, but the socket is a standard 3.5mm jack, and compatible with normal music headphones and CTIA handsfree devices (not the same as Sony Ericsson used to use alas). The (in)famous LED strip is surprisingly unobtrusive, even though it cannot be turned off altogether (though it’s not illuminated constantly either; I haven’t yet quite followed the logic, but it’s fine), but the optional pink end cap is pretty horrid in my opinion. Dressed all in black straight from the box, the phone is smart and businesslike.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
This review is from: Sony Xperia U Sim Free Smartphone – Black (Electronics)
I own a Galaxy S which was amazing for two years. It could not cope well with multi tasking or more demanding apps. I got fed up it with it and was looking for a change. I preferred a mobile phone that could perform well but at a decent price. I did quite a bit of research because I am a bit funny about technology which I am not going to rant about.
1) Cost The two options I were weighting up was the Xperia U (£125 approx as an upgrade from Phones4u on PAYG at the time this was written) or the Star N8000 (£125 approx sold on Amazon).
2) Performance: The spec seemed better with the Star as it has 1GB of RAM. The Sony has 512K. I assumed Star would outperform. According to various U tube Antutu benchmarking videos however I noted the following scores (the higher the score the better):
Samsung Galaxy S: Score 3007 Star N8000: Score 3200 Sony Xperia U: Score 5333
You can imagine if I got the Star I might have been a bit cross.
3) Looks: – The Sony is small, like a mobile phone should be and not look like a tablet. It fits in the hand well and the pocket. – It has square corners not round corners. I dont understand why a lot of phones have the round corners, probably health and safety or something. Its my personal preference by the way. Maybe I am sick of rounded corners now. Square cars is still a NO for now. – The light strip is a cool touch. The phone feels like it comes to life when you use it and is customisable. – It says SONY above the touch screen. I feel proud to be the owner of this device. I remember the days when you see ‘Sony’ it meant expensive but quality.
4) Software – Running gingerbread 2.3. Apparently will be upgraded to Ice cream sandwich 4.0 in September. Im happy with the software as it is. – Due to the small screen it maybe difficult for some people to type on this device. The spell check built in is pretty efficient. If you make a mistake, the software will rectify it when you type the next word. – Not as clever as the Galaxy S software. For example, on the Galaxy S you can swipe the text message to call someone. That was useful. Swiping from top of the screen to activate bluetooth, wifi etc was also very useful.
5) Storage capacity – limited. 2gb dedicated to apps. 4gb for all others. This is fine for me. Other people may wish to carry more things. – No expansion. Good. From previous experience, expansions slow the phone down.
6) Battery life: OK. Lasted two days tops whilst playing games now and again. The battery can be changed. I intend to buy a replacement battery with higher capacity and use the one provided as a backup.
7) Recent Issues with the phone: This phone worked like a dream on wifi for 15 mins. Then it started connecting to the router with ‘limited connection’ ie no internet. Apparently this is a common problem with these phones. I was determined to resolve this because I truely believe this phone is fantastic for the price, performs like a dream and looks great.
I updated the Belkin router with the latest firmware release. It did the trick for me. If you come across this problem I hope the suggestion will resolve the problem.
Thanks for reading.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
This review is from: Sony Xperia U Sim Free Smartphone – Black (Electronics)
Being a mid 50-Something Silver Surfer; (picture Paul Whitehouse – Aviva health food Internet Cafe tv ad – ‘any chance of a bacon sandwich around here’?), increasingly struggling with a small (2.4″) screen handset but with a contract soon to expire I began looking for a new phone with a larger screen to read more easily and to do a little surfing. (Luckily a recent eye test and the arrival of new spectacles coincided with the new phone so I should be suitably ‘optimised’ for the next 18/24 months!).
I mainly use my phone for texts, calls, an ‘always to hand’ camera, radio and now with a larger screen some light video capture/Internet usage. However being my first Smartphone I have found it above all to be extremely useful for checking and managing various online accounts with some excellent apps I have installed.
I do not use social media or download games. Whilst I may watch some catch-up tv I believe films/drama/sport/concerts and the like deserve the infinitely superior viewing experience of a decent widescreen tv with a good home cinema sound system. The fact that I work from home most of the time obviously influences my usage patterns too. In other words as far as Smartphones are concerned I am a light to moderate user whom does not live life super-glued to a handset!
I chanced upon this Sony Xperia U by pure good fortune. I was 90% committed to opting for another brand when I was shown this alternative handset. Directly comparing them the superior screen quality of the Sony was immediately apparent. The alternative phones screen looked perfectly fine until viewed alongside the Sony against which it then became distinctly average; not as bright, sharp or crystal clear as the stunning Xperia’s. I most strongly recommend anyone to directly compare phones this way before purchasing regardless of whatever all the revues or tests say. The combination of this, and its value, performance, features, quality, style, spec., et’al represented to me sooooo much phone for your hard earned £’s.
Now for a few facts and observations: The screen is 3.5″ in a ‘wider’ 16:9 ratio i.e. like a widescreen tv and unlike the ‘squarer’ 3:2 ratio of most other 3.5″ screens. This somewhat obviously works particularly well when for example viewing a programme on iplayer. Viewing a web page/typing a text in landscape mode is also perfectly okay however, because of the relative ‘narrowness’ of the 16:9 ratio typing a text in portrait mode is very difficult indeed.
As said the clarity of the screen is the best I’ve ever seen, it would take something rather special to beat it unless of course you opt for a larger one at in many instances a far greater cost. I also wanted my phone to remain relatively compact and ‘pocket-able’ i.e. truly ‘mobile’ with the bonus trade-off of ‘better’ battery life that a ‘smaller’ screen affords. So to reiterate; I always use the keyboard in landscape mode. The keys are larger but still a tad fiddly. Little problem for myself as I have average hands with slender-ish fingers. Someone with larger hands/fingers still might struggle even in this landscape mode?
A partial solution would be to obtain as I have done, essentially to use with a drawing/painting app, a stylus. A company on Amazon; mediadevil does a Magicwand as they describe it. It’s a quality ‘low friction capacitive stylus’ that works a treat.
Whilst the screen is a significant 1.1″ step-up from my previous Nokia C3-01 Touch & Type the actual characters are not necessarily any larger; even slightly the opposite perhaps? I shall be searching for alternative/bolder fonts or perhaps start using upper case and/or downloading a well known award winning keyboard app. The fact that the screen is so crisp and clear does however offset this ‘shortcoming’ to a significant degree; it really helps. Once again another solid reason why you should view the phone/a Webpage/the keyboard/font at first hand before you commit. Even in this circa sub-£200 sector it still represents a lot of money for many including myself.
Battery life is said to be 2-3 days which at this early stage sounds just about right for light to moderate usage. By today’s Smartphone driven dire battery performance world this is as good as one can expect? Obviously each individuals needs/usage greatly influence any phones battery life. Heavy Internet/games & video usage etc equals heavier battery consumption. Wherever you fall in the usage stakes I very much doubt you will ever find yourself thinking; ‘crickey its not going to last out the day’! Whilst on the subject of batteries the Xperia U’s is reassuringly removable unlike some phones where it forms an albeit mildly worrying integral part of the handset. Another advantage of this is if you are a heavier user a spare battery can be purchased and carried as a back-up; a practise widely employed with digital cameras.
So far so good – a great little phone for the money,
I’ll get it over with first: the well-discussed (if you’ve followed the forums and read other reviews) lack of a memory card slot is a bit naff, but with a small screen you’re not likely to loading it up with oodles of videos. Bear in mind there is 6GB user memory altogether (2GB for apps, 4GB for media), not 4GB as many say. Know your needs, and take your pick. Rather annoyingly, the phone’s memory does not appear as a standard mass-storage device when you plug it in with USB, instead it uses MTP for which support without installing bloated extra software is somewhat patchy. However I have successfully coaxed it to work with Windows XP and Ubuntu Linux.
The design is surprisingly decent, build quality average to good, and the screen is luscious – do fit a screen protector (at least one should be supplied) immediately to keep it that way. Some may not be so keen on the widescreen 16:9 ratio compared with the iPhone’s 3:2, which does mean that although both are nominally 3.5″ screens, the iPhone’s is more spacious for portrait mode messaging. Android 2.3.7 works well enough so far, and Sony admit the specs (especially 512MB RAM) are a bit borderline for the promised ICS upgrade, so not sure whether I will bother with that. Battery life isn’t too shabby, thanks to the efficient NovaThor processor – with light use, 2 to 3 days between charge seems about order of the day, but obviously not everyone’s definition of “light” is the same. The camera is fair, with the 4mm f/2.6 lens well recessed to keep it protected, and a physical shutter button (also activates the camera from sleep) though it is quite stiff.
The supplied handsfree headset is about as cheap as Sony could muster, but the socket is a standard 3.5mm jack, and compatible with normal music headphones and CTIA handsfree devices (not the same as Sony Ericsson used to use alas). The (in)famous LED strip is surprisingly unobtrusive, even though it cannot be turned off altogether (though it’s not illuminated constantly either; I haven’t yet quite followed the logic, but it’s fine), but the optional pink end cap is pretty horrid in my opinion. Dressed all in black straight from the box, the phone is smart and businesslike.
Was this review helpful to you?
|A good all round smartphone that looks elegant, performs very well and good value for money.,
I own a Galaxy S which was amazing for two years. It could not cope well with multi tasking or more demanding apps. I got fed up it with it and was looking for a change. I preferred a mobile phone that could perform well but at a decent price. I did quite a bit of research because I am a bit funny about technology which I am not going to rant about.
1) Cost
The two options I were weighting up was the Xperia U (£125 approx as an upgrade from Phones4u on PAYG at the time this was written) or the Star N8000 (£125 approx sold on Amazon).
2) Performance:
The spec seemed better with the Star as it has 1GB of RAM. The Sony has 512K. I assumed Star would outperform. According to various U tube Antutu benchmarking videos however I noted the following scores (the higher the score the better):
Samsung Galaxy S: Score 3007
Star N8000: Score 3200
Sony Xperia U: Score 5333
You can imagine if I got the Star I might have been a bit cross.
3) Looks:
– The Sony is small, like a mobile phone should be and not look like a tablet. It fits in the hand well and the pocket.
– It has square corners not round corners. I dont understand why a lot of phones have the round corners, probably health and safety or something. Its my personal preference by the way. Maybe I am sick of rounded corners now. Square cars is still a NO for now.
– The light strip is a cool touch. The phone feels like it comes to life when you use it and is customisable.
– It says SONY above the touch screen. I feel proud to be the owner of this device. I remember the days when you see ‘Sony’ it meant expensive but quality.
4) Software
– Running gingerbread 2.3. Apparently will be upgraded to Ice cream sandwich 4.0 in September. Im happy with the software as it is.
– Due to the small screen it maybe difficult for some people to type on this device. The spell check built in is pretty efficient. If you make a mistake, the software will rectify it when you type the next word.
– Not as clever as the Galaxy S software. For example, on the Galaxy S you can swipe the text message to call someone. That was useful. Swiping from top of the screen to activate bluetooth, wifi etc was also very useful.
5) Storage capacity
– limited. 2gb dedicated to apps. 4gb for all others. This is fine for me. Other people may wish to carry more things.
– No expansion. Good. From previous experience, expansions slow the phone down.
6) Battery life:
OK. Lasted two days tops whilst playing games now and again. The battery can be changed. I intend to buy a replacement battery with higher capacity and use the one provided as a backup.
7) Recent Issues with the phone:
This phone worked like a dream on wifi for 15 mins. Then it started connecting to the router with ‘limited connection’ ie no internet. Apparently this is a common problem with these phones. I was determined to resolve this because I truely believe this phone is fantastic for the price, performs like a dream and looks great.
I updated the Belkin router with the latest firmware release. It did the trick for me. If you come across this problem I hope the suggestion will resolve the problem.
Thanks for reading.
Was this review helpful to you?
|Initial Impressions – Pretty Good So Far,
Being a mid 50-Something Silver Surfer; (picture Paul Whitehouse – Aviva health food Internet Cafe tv ad – ‘any chance of a bacon sandwich around here’?), increasingly struggling with a small (2.4″) screen handset but with a contract soon to expire I began looking for a new phone with a larger screen to read more easily and to do a little surfing. (Luckily a recent eye test and the arrival of new spectacles coincided with the new phone so I should be suitably ‘optimised’ for the next 18/24 months!).
I mainly use my phone for texts, calls, an ‘always to hand’ camera, radio and now with a larger screen some light video capture/Internet usage. However being my first Smartphone I have found it above all to be extremely useful for checking and managing various online accounts with some excellent apps I have installed.
I do not use social media or download games. Whilst I may watch some catch-up tv I believe films/drama/sport/concerts and the like deserve the infinitely superior viewing experience of a decent widescreen tv with a good home cinema sound system. The fact that I work from home most of the time obviously influences my usage patterns too. In other words as far as Smartphones are concerned I am a light to moderate user whom does not live life super-glued to a handset!
I chanced upon this Sony Xperia U by pure good fortune. I was 90% committed to opting for another brand when I was shown this alternative handset. Directly comparing them the superior screen quality of the Sony was immediately apparent. The alternative phones screen looked perfectly fine until viewed alongside the Sony against which it then became distinctly average; not as bright, sharp or crystal clear as the stunning Xperia’s. I most strongly recommend anyone to directly compare phones this way before purchasing regardless of whatever all the revues or tests say. The combination of this, and its value, performance, features, quality, style, spec., et’al represented to me sooooo much phone for your hard earned £’s.
Now for a few facts and observations: The screen is 3.5″ in a ‘wider’ 16:9 ratio i.e. like a widescreen tv and unlike the ‘squarer’ 3:2 ratio of most other 3.5″ screens. This somewhat obviously works particularly well when for example viewing a programme on iplayer. Viewing a web page/typing a text in landscape mode is also perfectly okay however, because of the relative ‘narrowness’ of the 16:9 ratio typing a text in portrait mode is very difficult indeed.
As said the clarity of the screen is the best I’ve ever seen, it would take something rather special to beat it unless of course you opt for a larger one at in many instances a far greater cost. I also wanted my phone to remain relatively compact and ‘pocket-able’ i.e. truly ‘mobile’ with the bonus trade-off of ‘better’ battery life that a ‘smaller’ screen affords. So to reiterate; I always use the keyboard in landscape mode. The keys are larger but still a tad fiddly. Little problem for myself as I have average hands with slender-ish fingers. Someone with larger hands/fingers still might struggle even in this landscape mode?
A partial solution would be to obtain as I have done, essentially to use with a drawing/painting app, a stylus. A company on Amazon; mediadevil does a Magicwand as they describe it. It’s a quality ‘low friction capacitive stylus’ that works a treat.
Whilst the screen is a significant 1.1″ step-up from my previous Nokia C3-01 Touch & Type the actual characters are not necessarily any larger; even slightly the opposite perhaps? I shall be searching for alternative/bolder fonts or perhaps start using upper case and/or downloading a well known award winning keyboard app. The fact that the screen is so crisp and clear does however offset this ‘shortcoming’ to a significant degree; it really helps. Once again another solid reason why you should view the phone/a Webpage/the keyboard/font at first hand before you commit. Even in this circa sub-£200 sector it still represents a lot of money for many including myself.
Battery life is said to be 2-3 days which at this early stage sounds just about right for light to moderate usage. By today’s Smartphone driven dire battery performance world this is as good as one can expect? Obviously each individuals needs/usage greatly influence any phones battery life. Heavy Internet/games & video usage etc equals heavier battery consumption. Wherever you fall in the usage stakes I very much doubt you will ever find yourself thinking; ‘crickey its not going to last out the day’! Whilst on the subject of batteries the Xperia U’s is reassuringly removable unlike some phones where it forms an albeit mildly worrying integral part of the handset. Another advantage of this is if you are a heavier user a spare battery can be purchased and carried as a back-up; a practise widely employed with digital cameras.
Family/friends loved the…
Read more
Was this review helpful to you?
|